Elena Pridankina vs Tamara Korpatsch Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does each player's second serve performance compare recently? Korpatsch has a 39.25% success rate, slightly trailing Pridankina's 40.27%.
• In the return game, Korpatsch has excelled against opponents' second serves with a 49.25% win rate, while Pridankina stands higher at 53.77%.
• Who is more effective at returning first serves? Korpatsch leads with 36.02%, outpacing Pridankina's 33.24% effectiveness.
• Under pressure, Korpatsch has a slight edge, saving 45.65% of breakpoints compared to Pridankina's 44.16%.
• Looking at their overall performance over the past year, Pridankina boasts a 60.87% win rate, surpassing Korpatsch's 46.27%.
• Which surfaces suit them best? Korpatsch performs best on clay with a 65% win rate, whereas Pridankina shines on indoor hard courts at 72%.
• Both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Pridankina has a slightly better win rate of 65% compared to Korpatsch's 61.11%.
• Korpatsch has faced stronger opponents, playing against those ranked 173.27 on average, versus Pridankina's opponents who average a rank of 268.07.
• In deciding sets over the past year, Korpatsch has won 46% of the time, marginally better than Pridankina's 45%.
• Analyzing break point conversion rates, Korpatsch narrowly leads with 41.32% compared to Pridankina's 40.56%.

Editorial Prediction (June 3, 2025, UTC):

Based on recent performances, both Korpatsch and Pridankina showcase competitive edges across various facets of the game. Pridankina has a slight advantage on second serve success and return game statistics for second serves, indicating strong performance under rally conditions.

Korpatsch, on the other hand, demonstrates superior performance in saving breakpoints and converting break point opportunities, offering an edge during crucial game moments.

The deciding factor might come down to the surface in play and the quality of opponents faced. Although Pridankina has a higher win percentage, Korpatsch has competed against stronger opponents and might therefore be better prepared for a challenging match.

Given the comprehensive analysis of these statistics, Korpatsch appears to hold a marginal advantage and is the likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.